Grading State Disclosure 2008 Logo Graphic

V i r g i n i a

Honor
Grade
Rank
B+
5

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
A-
4
Electronic Filing Program
C
25
Disclosure Content Accessibility
B
20
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
B
10

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Virginia

Virginia earned a B+ and a top five ranking in 2008, up from a B and 7th in 2007 and a D+ and 22nd in 2003. Virginia improved from a B- in 2007 to a B in the usability category as the result of a stronger usability test performance this year.

Virginia’s strong disclosure law earned an A- again in 2008 and ranked 4th in this area of the assessment. Candidates must disclose detailed information about donors giving over $100, including occupation and employer data and the cumulative amount given by a single contributor. Expenditure disclosure is also strong and candidates must report subvendor details and accrued expenditures. Independent expenditures must be reported within 24 hours, including those made in the last days of a campaign. All statewide candidates in Virginia are required to file disclosure reports electronically; while electronic filing is voluntary for legislative candidates, an impressive 98 percent chose this option in the last election. The program likely enjoys this level of success thanks to the State Board of Elections’ innovative “Electronic Filing Trendsetter Program”, which establishes an electronic filing database for each candidate, provides one-on-one support, and awards certificates for mastering the electronic filing process.

Virginia maintained a B and ranked 20th in the accessibility category in 2008. The State Board of Elections’ web site features a searchable database of contributions and expenditures that contains both electronically-filed reports and paper-filed reports that have been data-entered by agency staff. Users can search for itemized transactions by the name and zip code of a donor or payee, or by the date or amount of specific transactions. As noted in previous studies, database users seeking to conduct extensive research may find it difficult to access itemized search results because such results are not directly displayed; rather, users are provided with links to the individual reports where the search results were originally disclosed, which can make the research process cumbersome.

A stronger performance on the usability test earned Virginia a B in the web site usability category in 2008, up from a B- in 2007. Virginia was one of seven states to achieve the highest possible rating on the 2008 test and all testers expressed confidence in the data they found on the site. The State Board of Elections’ site offers a clear description of the data available, detailed lists of candidates, and both original and clearly-labeled amended reports. The site could be improved by adding overviews of the totals raised and spent by candidates for each office, and instructions for using the searchable database.

Quick Fix: Provide a simple comparison of the totals raised and spent by candidates for each office in the most recent election.

Editor’s Pick: The State Board of Elections’ web site uses clear language and graphics that make navigation very easy. View image

Disclosure Agency: State Board of Elections
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.sbe.virginia.gov/cms

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published September 17, 2008
| Last updated September 17 2008
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.