Grading State Disclosure 2008 Logo Graphic

N e w . M e x i c o

Grade
Rank
F
41

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
D-
43
Electronic Filing Program
A
18
Disclosure Content Accessibility
F
38
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
F
50

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in New Mexico

New Mexico has earned an F in each of the five Grading State Disclosure assessments conducted since 2003, and ranked 41st in 2008. Despite its strong requirements for electronic filing, New Mexico does not offer timely access to campaign finance data online, and ranked last in terms of web site usability in 2008.

New Mexico earned a D- in 2008 and ranked 43rd in the Campaign Disclosure Law category. Candidates are required to itemize contributions of $250 or more, and must report the occupations, but not the employers, of their donors. Candidates must also disclose large, last-minute contributions before Election Day. Campaign expenditures must be itemized, but reports do not include subvendor details. Loan disclosure and enforcement provisions are weak, and independent expenditure disclosure is not expressly required under New Mexico’s disclosure law. New Mexico requires electronic filing by statewide candidates who raise $2,500 and legislative candidates who raise $1,000, earning the state an A in this category in 2008.

New Mexico earned an F again in the accessibility category in 2008 though the state did move up one place in the accessibility rankings since 2007 with the addition of an online, searchable database of campaign contributions. Visitors can search electronically-filed reports within the database by donor name, and search results can be sorted online. The lack of a searchable database of campaign expenditures is a major weakness of the site, and it can take up to two weeks to post reports. In May 2008, the Associated Press reported on New Mexico’s “cumbersome” disclosure program, noting the system is “slow, [and] difficult to use.” While the legislature has appropriated almost $250,000 over the last two years for system enhancements, changes are not expected soon. The Secretary of State’s office reported to AP that it is planning to “bank the money and seek additional financing to eventually buy a new computer system”, which is estimated by the agency to cost at least $800,000.

New Mexico has received an F in the web site usability category in each of the five Grading State Disclosure assessments, and ranked 50th in 2008. Despite a site makeover since the last assessment, the majority of usability testers reported that the site was “very confusing” and all of the testers rated the Secretary of State’s site poorly. To make the site more user-friendly, the agency could provide a clear description of the data available online, instructions for accessing data, and clearer terminology to guide site visitors.

Quick Fix: Simplify the terminology used on the disclosure site. For example, “ALL YEARS Campaign Reports filed Electronically and Contribution Search” could be changed to “Search Electronically-Filed Reports.”

Editor’s Pick: Itemized contributions from electronically-filed reports can be sorted online by numerous fields, including date, occupation, and amount. View image

Disclosure Agency: Secretary of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.sos.state.nm.us

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published September 17, 2008
| Last updated September 17 2008
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.